Was the Trail of Tears an Instance of Ethnic Cleansing?

HIST 101 β€” Primary Source Analysis Worksheet
Your answers save automatically in this browser.
Name
Course / Section
Date

Instructions. Read the twelve documents in the Trail of Tears β€” Primary Source Reader. For each characteristic below, choose Yes, Partly, or No based on the guiding questions, then give brief evidence and a citation. Finish with the Short Conclusion, click Print / Save to PDF, and upload the PDF to Canvas. Required filename: Last_First_IndianRemoval.pdf. See Canvas for the due date and grading.

How to fill in each row
  • Yes: the evidence clearly meets this characteristic. No: the evidence clearly does not. Partly: the evidence meets some guiding questions but not others. If you choose Partly, say which part is met and which is not.
  • Evidence: a short quotation, number, or description (1–3 sentences) and a few words on how it answers the questions.
  • Citation: the document number, author, title, date, and URL, for example Doc 7. Evan Jones, letter, June 16, 1838. https://www.nps.gov/.... You may also cite the course lecture by title and date with no URL: HIST 101 lecture, β€œRemoval” (Ch. 11, Lecture 3), [date of class].
  • Your work saves in this browser on this device only. Before you switch computers, print to PDF. β€œClear my answers” erases everything.

Working Definition: Ethnic Cleansing

Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of an ethnic, racial, or religious group from a geographic area through violence, intimidation, forced deportation, or other coercive means, with the intent to create an ethnically homogeneous region. It is distinct from genocide in that the primary goal is removal rather than complete physical destruction (though the two can overlap).

Analytical Checklist for Identifying Ethnic Cleansing

Characteristics (with guiding questions) Yes, Partly, or No Evidence (brief quotation, data, or description) Citation (Doc number, author, title, date + URL)
1. Targeted Group Identification
– Was a specific ethnic, racial, or religious group targeted?
– Was targeting based on group identity rather than individual actions?
– Were group members treated collectively as a single category?
Where to look: Docs 2, 3, 4, 5, 11
2. Intent and Goal
– Is there evidence of intent to remove the group from a territory?
– Do official or de facto policies aim to create ethnic or racial homogeneity?
– Were stated justifications (e.g., security, progress, civilization) used to legitimize removal?
Where to look: Docs 1, 2
3. Methods of Removal
– Was forced deportation or relocation used?
– Were homes, villages, or cultural sites destroyed?
– Were basic needs (food, water, shelter, medical care) denied or withheld?
– Were conditions made unlivable to coerce departure?
– Was physical violence or the threat of violence used?
– Were families separated during the process?
Where to look: Docs 4–11
4. Systematic Nature
– Was the process organized or coordinated rather than random?
– Was there state or institutional involvement?
– Were policies or laws enacted to facilitate removal?
– Were the military or police used to enforce removal?
Where to look: Docs 1, 3, 5, 9
5. Scale and Scope
– Were large numbers of people affected?
– Did the actions cover a significant geographic area?
– Was there a comprehensive attempt to remove the group from the region?
Where to look: Docs 5, 8, 10, 12
6. Accompanying Atrocities
– Did mass killings or massacres occur?
– Was sexual violence used as a weapon?
– Was torture or cruel treatment used?
– Were cultural or religious sites destroyed?
– Were property and assets seized from the targeted group?
Where to look: Docs 6, 7, 8, 12
7. Outcomes
– Did the population demographics change significantly?
– Was displacement permanent or long-term for most victims?
– Was land or property transferred to the dominant group?
– Did the actions produce lasting trauma and destruction of community structures?
Where to look: Docs 3, 4, 7, 12

Short Conclusion (2–4 sentences)

State your overall verdict, name your strongest evidence, and admit the strongest evidence against your verdict (for example, on Intent or Accompanying Atrocities).