Part B — Independent Study

Fame, Harlem,
and the Right to Be Seen

The Argument Behind the Art

HIST 102 · Chapter 24, Lecture 3 · Harlem Renaissance

How to Use This Deck

  • Work through slides at your own pace
  • 🔗 Link slides — open the site, spend a few minutes, then return
  • ✍ Response slides — type your answer directly in the box; your work saves automatically
  • 📝 Check slides — answer the question, then click Show Answer
  • At the end: review all your responses and click Print / Save as PDF to submit
⚠ Your responses are saved to this browser on this device only. Complete the deck on the same computer you start on.

Section I

The New Visual Economy

The tradition they inherited — and the battlefield they walked into

Frederick Douglass — The Tradition They Inherited

  • Douglass sat for formal portraits more than any other American of the 19th century — including Lincoln and Grant
  • He was not vain — he was conducting a long-running argument
  • The camera recorded reality without the distortions of minstrel caricature or racist illustration
  • Each portrait: a refutation addressed to any Black American who might see it
The Harlem Renaissance photographers knew this tradition. They were continuing it.
Frederick Douglass formal portrait photograph 1860s
📸 Search: "Frederick Douglass portrait photograph 1860s"
Source: Library of Congress

Frederick Douglass · ca. 1866 · Library of Congress · Public Domain

The Visual Field They Were Fighting

  • D.W. Griffith's The Birth of a Nation (1915) — technically innovative, enormously popular, and virulently racist
  • Depicted the Ku Klux Klan as heroic defenders of civilization; Black men as predators
  • Woodrow Wilson screened it at the White House; the revived Klan used it as a recruitment tool
  • The NAACP organized protests in cities across the country — and lost
Black photographers and artists were not making aesthetic choices in a neutral space. They were contesting a visual field that had been systematically weaponized against them.

80 Million Americans a Week

  • 1920 U.S. population: approximately 106 million
  • Weekly movie attendance: approximately 80 million
  • Same films, same faces, same visual codes — across all regional divides
  • Silent film trained audiences to read a face as a language
For the first time: a genuinely national visual culture

Appearance as Argument

  • If appearance was a language — controlling how you appeared was speech
  • The studio portrait: a deliberate statement of social worth
  • "We are people whose lives have occasions worth commemorating"
  • Identity increasingly constituted through how you were seen, not only reputation
This is what the Harlem Renaissance was fighting over

The New Power of Visibility

The struggle over representation — who appeared in images, how they appeared, and who controlled those images — acquired a political weight in the 1920s it had not previously carried.
The visual economy of the 1920s made the Harlem Renaissance's artistic program a political program.

📝 Check Your Understanding

What made celebrity a mass phenomenon in the 1920s, unlike earlier forms of fame?

  1. Politicians became more popular than entertainment figures
  2. Film distributed recognizable faces to millions who had never met them
  3. Newspapers began publishing more photographs
  4. Radio made voices nationally familiar

⏸ Pause & Reflect

Douglass understood in the 1860s that controlling your image was a form of power. By the 1920s, Hollywood was distributing racist caricatures to 80 million people a week. What does that gap tell us about the difference between access to a medium and control of one — and why did the Harlem Renaissance's visual program constitute an act of heroic resistance?

Section II

The Portrait as Argument

James Van Der Zee — heroic resistance one portrait at a time

The Guarantee Photo Studio

  • Opened 1916, West 125th Street, Harlem
  • Documented weddings, funerals, veterans, families, celebrities
  • Clients came prepared — finest clothes, symbols of achievement
  • Van Der Zee composed, lit, and retouched deliberately
James Van Der Zee portrait photographer Harlem Renaissance studio
📸 Search: "James Van Der Zee photographer portrait Harlem"
Source: Library of Congress / NGA

James Van Der Zee · Harlem photographer · 1886–1983

What the Portraits Were Fighting

  • A century of racist visual culture: minstrel caricatures, Sambo figures, threatening stereotypes
  • These images were not merely offensive — they were arguments
  • Embedded in advertising, entertainment, and political cartoons since the antebellum era
  • They said: Black people are types, not individuals with inner lives
Van Der Zee's counter-argument: specific, named, durable evidence

Deliberateness as Strategy

  • Historian Deborah Willis: respectability in these portraits was not assimilation
  • It was a strategic deployment of the visual language of dignity
  • The straight back, the direct gaze, the fine clothes: each a deliberate choice
  • Every print leaving his studio inserted a named individual into the visual record
"We are here, we are composed, we claim the right to be seen as we actually are."

The Couple in Raccoon Coats (1932)

  • Cadillac V-16, full-length raccoon coats, gleaming shoes
  • Taken during the Great Depression, third year
  • Black Americans: first fired, last hired, excluded from federal relief
  • The display of prosperity is not naive — it is argument
Van Der Zee composed for luminosity — light as a claim about beauty
James Van Der Zee Couple in Raccoon Coats 1932 Harlem photograph
📸 Search: "Van Der Zee Couple Raccoon Coats 1932"
Source: UMMA / umma.umich.edu

James Van Der Zee · Couple in Raccoon Coats · 1932 · © Van Der Zee Archive, The Met

🔗 Explore: Van Der Zee at the NGA

✍ Follow-Up Question 1 of 5

Van Der Zee — Written Response · 3–4 sentences
Choose one Van Der Zee portrait from the NGA collection — not the Couple in Raccoon Coats. Describe what you see specifically. Then explain what argument the image is making about its subject. Use the word deliberate somewhere in your answer.
✓ Saved
⚠ Your response saves automatically to this browser on this device only. Use the same computer start-to-finish.

📝 Check Your Understanding

Deborah Willis argues that the respectability in Van Der Zee's portraits was not assimilation to white standards. What does she mean?

  1. His subjects were already middle-class and dressed accordingly
  2. The portraits were made for Black audiences, not white critics
  3. The deliberate staging of dignity was a strategic counter-argument in a context where that dignity was systematically denied
  4. Van Der Zee worked outside the commercial studio system

⏸ Pause & Reflect

Van Der Zee's portraits inserted named individuals into the visual record. Why does it matter that the subjects were named — not anonymous — and that the images were durable?

Section III

The Visual Language of the Movement

Aaron Douglas, The Crisis, and the parallel visual infrastructure

Aaron Douglas — A Style That Argued

  • Arrived Harlem 1925, recruited by Alain Locke
  • Silhouette figures: bold, flat, angular — unmistakably Black, unmistakably heroic
  • Synthesis of West African forms, Egyptian visual traditions, and European modernism
  • Visual argument: dual heritage — rooted in Africa, oriented toward modernity
Aaron Douglas Harlem Renaissance illustration silhouette figures New Negro
📸 Search: "Aaron Douglas Aspects Negro Life mural 1934"
Source: Schomburg Center / NYPL Digital Collections

Aaron Douglas · Illustrator of the Harlem Renaissance · 1899–1979

Aspects of Negro Life (1934)

  • Four murals painted for Harlem branch, New York Public Library
  • Traces the full arc: Africa → Middle Passage → slavery → Reconstruction → Great Migration → Harlem
  • Placed in a public library — free, accessible to any Harlem resident
  • Art that only reaches gallery-goers has accepted the existing terms of access
Distribution was part of the argument

The Black Press as Visual Infrastructure

The Publications
  • The Crisis (NAACP) — peak 100,000 subscribers
  • Opportunity (Urban League) — launched Hughes, Hurston, Cullen
  • Chicago Defender — national Black readership ~250,000
What They Did
  • Produced and distributed images of Black achievement
  • Reached communities the white press was not serving
  • A parallel visual culture — on its own terms
The power to define, for your own community, what you looked like and what you were capable of

🔗 Explore: Aaron Douglas at NYPL

✍ Follow-Up Question 2 of 5

Aaron Douglas — Written Response · 3–4 sentences
In what ways do Douglas's figures draw on West African or Egyptian visual traditions? In what ways do they reflect European modernism? What is Douglas arguing — visually — by combining these traditions rather than choosing one?
✓ Saved
⚠ Your response saves automatically to this browser on this device only. Use the same computer start-to-finish.

📝 Check Your Understanding

Why did Aaron Douglas choose to paint murals for a public library rather than selling work to galleries?

  1. Galleries refused to display work by Black artists
  2. He believed art should be accessible to the community it depicted, not only wealthy collectors
  3. The library commission paid more than gallery sales
  4. He was funded by a federal New Deal program that required public placement

⏸ Pause & Reflect

Van Der Zee used the portrait. Douglas used the mural and the illustrated magazine. Both were working within the same visual economy. What made their work specifically political, rather than simply artistic?

Section IV

The Music That Built the Neighborhood

Jazz as community infrastructure — and heroic resistance inside an exploitative frame

Two Jazz Economies

What White America Heard
  • The Cotton Club's radio broadcasts
  • Commercial recordings on major labels
  • Jazz filtered through white gatekeepers, white venues, white expectations
  • The export version of a much deeper cultural economy
What Harlem Built
  • The Savoy Ballroom — open to all, standard set by the community
  • The rent party circuit — Black-controlled, finest players in the city
  • Race records — direct to Black households nationwide
  • A self-sustaining musical economy that white institutions could not control
The music that traveled outward was the surplus product of an internal economy built for Black Harlem first

The Savoy Ballroom — Excellence on Its Own Terms

  • Opened Lenox Avenue, 1926 — Black-Jewish partnership, open to everyone, 25-cent admission
  • Floor large enough for thousands; the best jazz in the world every night
  • Cutting contests — two bands on facing bandstands, competing simultaneously, crowd decides the winner
  • The competitive pressure was horizontal — between musicians — not vertical toward white commercial taste
The standard was set by the community it served. That is what self-determination in culture looks like.
Savoy Ballroom Harlem Lenox Avenue 1920s jazz dancers
📸 Search: "Savoy Ballroom Harlem 1920s photograph"
Source: Schomburg Center / NYPL

Savoy Ballroom · 596 Lenox Avenue, Harlem · Opened 1926

The Cotton Club — The Central Contradiction

  • Opened 1923 — owned by bootlegger Owney Madden; Black performers, Black staff, white-only audience
  • The neighborhood that produced the music was not permitted to hear it at its most prominent venue
  • Management demanded a "jungle" aesthetic — deliberate evocation of African primitivism for white audiences
  • Duke Ellington's residency began 1927 — and what he did there is the most important case study in the Renaissance
The question: can an artist exercise genuine creative agency inside a structure designed to exploit and contain him?

Ellington — Masterworks Through Constraints

  • Did not simplify his music to serve the "jungle" aesthetic — used the Cotton Club's theatrical requirements as raw material, not a ceiling
  • Mood Indigo (1930) — unprecedented three-instrument voicing, composed for the Cotton Club stage
  • Sophisticated Lady (1933) — the title itself a quiet rebuke to the primitive framing
  • CBS/NBC radio broadcasts carried his orchestra live to millions — including Black listeners across the country who could hear him without the Club's racial admission policy
The instrument of exploitation became the instrument of transcendence — because the artist was good enough and determined enough to make it so
Duke Ellington Cotton Club Harlem orchestra 1927
📸 Search: "Duke Ellington Cotton Club orchestra 1927"
Source: Library of Congress

Duke Ellington · Cotton Club · Harlem · 1927–1931

One Argument — Three Instruments

Jazz, Hughes's poetry, and Douglas's murals were not parallel achievements. They were expressions of a single underlying commitment: Black cultural forms are already complete and sufficient. You do not need to apologize for them, translate them, or clean them up. You trust them — and you work.
  • Ellington — refused to simplify; metabolized constraints into sophistication
  • Hughes — made the poem perform the blues; the form is the argument
  • Douglas — syncopated rhythms of silhouetted figures; visual jazz moving across the canvas
  • Van Der Zee — the jazz musician in formal dress: Black life as it is actually lived is sufficient raw material for the highest art

📝 Check Your Understanding

How did Ellington's Cotton Club residency exemplify the lecture's thesis of "heroic resistance through excellence"?

  1. He publicly protested the Club's whites-only admission policy
  2. He refused to perform at the Club and built his reputation elsewhere
  3. He produced masterworks of increasing sophistication within an exploitative structure, turning the Club's radio broadcasts into a national platform for serious jazz
  4. He negotiated equal admission rights for Black Harlemites before accepting the residency

⏸ Pause & Reflect

The Savoy was open to all and set its own standards. The Cotton Club excluded the community while exploiting its musicians. The rent party circuit was entirely Black-controlled and never reached a white audience. Three institutions, three different relationships between excellence, exploitation, and self-reliance. Which model best represents the Renaissance's core argument about cultural self-determination — and does your answer change if the artist had no choice about which venue to play?

✍ Follow-Up Question 3 of 5

Jazz & Heroic Resistance — Written Response · 3–4 sentences
Ellington did not protest the Cotton Club's whites-only admission policy — he produced masterworks inside it and turned its radio broadcasts into a national platform. Is this an example of heroic resistance through excellence, or a compromise that served white commercial interests? Defend your position using specific evidence from this section.
✓ Saved
⚠ Your response saves automatically to this browser on this device only. Use the same computer start-to-finish.

Section V

The Debate Inside the Movement

Du Bois, Hughes, and Hurston — whose art, for whom, on whose terms

Du Bois: All Art Is Propaganda

"I do not care a damn for any art that is not used for propaganda. But I do care when propaganda is confined to one side while the other is stripped and silent."
— W.E.B. Du Bois, Criteria of Negro Art, The Crisis, October 1926
  • All art serves some interest, embodies some argument — there is no neutral art
  • The problem: white cultural institutions circulate pro-white arguments as common sense
  • Black counter-arguments have limited distribution — the field is unequal

The Control Problem

  • Publishers, galleries, record labels distributing Renaissance work were overwhelmingly white-owned
  • Commercial success = something white gatekeepers chose to distribute — on whose terms?
  • The Cotton Club: Black performers, white audiences — the community's culture sold back at a distance
  • Du Bois: who controls the means of cultural distribution controls the meaning

Hughes: Go to the Bottom

  • "The Negro Artist and the Racial Mountain", The Nation, 1926
  • The greatest danger: the desire to please white audiences and meet white standards
  • Go to the folk tradition — jazz clubs, rent parties, blues, vernacular — and trust it
  • The racial mountain: wanting to be white rather than making art that serves Black life
Not petition. Not assimilation. Assertion from the inside out.

Hurston: The Tradition Is the Standard

  • Went south to collect African American folk culture — stories, songs, speech, religious practice
  • Published Mules and Men (1935): folklore collected by a Black American, for the first time
  • Their Eyes Were Watching God (1937): written entirely in African American vernacular English
  • The vernacular is not a deficiency — it is a tradition of its own authority
This language is sufficient. It is, in its own terms, beautiful.

🔗 Read: Du Bois, "Criteria of Negro Art"

✍ Follow-Up Question 4 of 5

Du Bois, Hughes & Hurston — Written Response · 4–5 sentences
Du Bois, Hughes, and Hurston were each responding to the same reality. Where do you see genuine agreement among them? Where is there genuine disagreement? Which position do you find most convincing — and why?
✓ Saved
⚠ Your response saves automatically to this browser on this device only. Use the same computer start-to-finish.

📝 Check Your Understanding

What was Hughes's central critique of some middle-class Black intellectuals?

  1. They were too politically radical for mainstream publishers
  2. They wanted to write for white audiences and meet white standards rather than drawing on Black vernacular culture
  3. They were insufficiently educated to produce serious literary work
  4. They refused to engage with jazz and blues as legitimate art forms

⏸ Pause & Reflect

Du Bois asked: who controls the means of cultural distribution? Hughes answered: stop seeking their approval and trust your own culture. Ellington answered: refuse to simplify, and turn their platform into yours. Are these different answers — or are they all expressions of the same act of heroic resistance through excellence?

Synthesis

Heroic Resistance Through Excellence

They chose to build rather than beg

What the Evidence Shows

  • Van Der Zee — 10,000 portraits accumulated over decades constitute a counter-archive that minstrelsy and Hollywood could not erase
  • Douglas — African visual heritage was not a curiosity borrowed by Europeans but a living foundation for monumental public art, available to any artist confident enough to claim it
  • Ellington — a white-owned, Black-excluding club with a racist performance mandate can be converted, by a sufficiently determined artist, into a national dissemination mechanism for the most sophisticated jazz in America
  • Hughes & Hurston — art that trusts its own culture completely, without translation or apology, produces work that outlasts every argument made against it
Excellence produced for a community that genuinely needed it turned out to be the most durable kind

The Deepest Form of Resistance

The Harlem Renaissance was a deliberate, collective assertion that Black Americans would not wait for permission to create, to build, or to claim their full humanity. From the Great Migration's calculated departure, through Harlem and Greenwood's entrepreneurial vision, to the artists who trusted their own vernacular traditions without apology — this generation chose to build rather than beg.
The lasting irony: art that refused to announce itself as political argument did more damage to the ideology of white supremacy than most explicitly political work of the same era — precisely because it was undeniably excellent.

✍ Synthesis Question 5 of 5

Final Response — at least one full paragraph · Not a list
The Harlem Renaissance produced art of lasting significance under systematic oppression. Du Bois said cultural achievement without political equality was insufficient. Hughes said stop seeking white approval. Hurston preserved what would have been lost. Ellington turned an exploitative venue into a national platform.

Was the Harlem Renaissance an act of heroic resistance? Use at least two specific examples from this deck — and at least one from Part A — to support your answer. Address the strongest argument against your position.
✓ Saved
⚠ Your response saves automatically to this browser on this device only. Use the same computer start-to-finish.

📄 Your Responses

1 · Van Der Zee Portrait
No response yet.
2 · Aaron Douglas
No response yet.
3 · Jazz & Heroic Resistance
No response yet.
4 · Du Bois, Hughes & Hurston
No response yet.
5 · Synthesis
No response yet.
Use browser Print → Save as PDF to submit your work.

The Question That Remains Open

Are cultural excellence and internal strength ultimately more decisive in shaping long-term outcomes than external political structures — or are both required, in different measures, at different times?
  • The Harlem Renaissance did not end Jim Crow — but it permanently changed what America understood itself to be
  • Jim Crow fell to political organizing, legal challenge, and direct action — built on a foundation this generation laid
  • Hughes's poetry, Hurston's novel, Ellington's broadcasts, Van Der Zee's archive: none of these dismantled a single statute
The Harlem Renaissance raises this question with extraordinary clarity. It does not answer it. That is precisely why it remains worth studying.