Race, Exclusion, and the Architecture of Belonging
How race, law, and culture structured who could belong in American cities
The Central Paradox
🔑 Key Concept
Urbanization did not produce openness by default.
It produced boundaries.
As cities filled with newcomers, the United States increasingly defined itself not just by citizenship, but by race.
Part I
Asian Migration in Global Context
Understanding the transnational flow of labor
Decentering the United States
Asian migration was part of global labor circulation, not a U.S.-specific phenomenon.
Chinese emigration surged during the "Century of Revolution" (c. 1850–1949)
Migrants moved to: Southeast Asia, Hawaii, Latin America, Western United States
Driven by political instability, economic opportunity, and imperial expansion
×
Global Labor Circulation
In the late 1800s, capitalism and empire created massive flows of workers across continents. People moved:
From rural areas to mines, plantations, railroads, and cities
From colonized regions to imperial centers and frontier zones
From areas of political upheaval to places with labor demand
This was a global system. Chinese workers went to Peru, Cuba, Southeast Asia, Australia, and North America. Indian workers went to East Africa, the Caribbean, and Fiji. This movement was structured by capitalism (need for cheap labor) and empire (ability to move subjects across borders).
×
China's Century of Revolution (1850-1949)
This period saw massive upheaval in China:
Taiping Rebellion (1850-1864): Devastating civil war, ~20-30 million dead
Opium Wars: British and European imperialism forced open Chinese ports
Economic disruption: Traditional agriculture and trade collapsed in many regions
Qing Dynasty decline: Weakening central government couldn't maintain order
Republican Revolution (1911): Overthrow of imperial system
These crises pushed millions of Chinese to emigrate, seeking economic survival and safety.
Sojourners, Not Settlers
🔑 Key Concept: Sojourning
Chinese migrants were not refugees. Many were sojourners:
Intended to work temporarily and return home
Maintained strong homeland ties (remittances, kinship)
Viewed migration as a temporary economic strategy
Asian migration was transnational, circular, and deeply shaped by empire and capitalism.
Part II
Labor, Race, and the Racialization of Work
How Asian labor became a racial category
Welcome—Then Rejection
1868Burlingame Treaty encourages Chinese labor migration
Chinese workers were recruited for:
Mining (California gold rush, Nevada silver)
Railroad construction (Central Pacific, transcontinental lines)
Agriculture (farms, orchards, land reclamation)
Urban service trades (laundries, restaurants, domestic work)
×
Burlingame Treaty (1868)
A diplomatic agreement between the United States and China that:
Encouraged free migration: Recognized the right of Chinese to emigrate to the U.S.
Protected mutual trade: Opened economic relations
Promised equal treatment: Chinese in the U.S. would get "most favored nation" status
Context: The U.S. wanted Chinese labor for railroad construction and Western development. China wanted to protect its emigrants and maintain trade.
Irony: Just 14 years later, the U.S. passed the Chinese Exclusion Act (1882), directly violating the spirit of this treaty.
Hostility was not just economic—it was racial and cultural, rooted in ideas of civilization and whiteness.
×
"Coolie Labor" — A Racialized Category
The term "coolie" originally referred to low-wage Asian laborers, but it quickly became a racist slur implying:
Unfreedom: Coolies were portrayed as semi-enslaved, bound by exploitative contracts
Degradation: Working alongside "coolies" was seen as lowering white workers to an inferior status
Racial otherness: Coolies weren't just poor workers—they were racially unfit for American society
Reality vs. Stereotype: While some Chinese workers did come under exploitative labor contracts, most were free migrants seeking economic opportunity, just like European immigrants. But the "coolie" label stuck, making ALL Chinese workers seem like a threat to "free labor."
Key Scholar: Moon-Ho Jung in Coolies and Cane shows how "coolie labor" was invented as a racial category to justify exclusion.
Part III
Gender, Family, and the Logic of Exclusion
Preventing family formation as a strategy of exclusion
Targeting Reproduction
Exclusion targeted family formation, not just labor.
Early Chinese migration was overwhelmingly male (95%+)
The Page Law (1875) effectively barred Chinese women by labeling them presumed prostitutes.
Consequences:
Prevented family formation
Reinforced the "permanent foreigner" stereotype
Made assimilation structurally impossible
×
Page Law (1875)
The first federal immigration law to restrict entry based on race and gender.
Official Purpose: Ban the importation of "immoral" women (prostitutes)
Actual Effect: Created bureaucratic barriers that prevented virtually ALL Chinese women from immigrating
How It Worked:
Required women to undergo invasive interrogations in China and San Francisco
Assumed ALL Chinese women were prostitutes unless proven otherwise
Placed burden of proof on women to demonstrate "moral character"
Created long delays and denials
Impact:
Between 1875-1882, Chinese female immigration dropped by 70%. Even wives of legal residents were denied entry.
Historical Significance: This was the FIRST federal law restricting immigration—7 years BEFORE the more famous Chinese Exclusion Act. It targeted women specifically to prevent Chinese families from forming in the U.S.
Key Insight
🔑 Analytical Takeaway
Exclusion worked by disrupting reproduction, not just entry.
This strategy made assimilation structurally impossible and reinforced the "permanent foreigner" status of Asian Americans.
Part IV
Law as a Tool of Racial Boundary-Making
How immigration policy redefined American identity
The Legal Architecture of Exclusion
This is where race hardens into policy.
1790/1870Naturalization limited to "white persons" and persons of African descent
1875Page Law — Bars Chinese women
1882Chinese Exclusion Act — First federal law banning immigration by race
1917Asiatic Barred Zone — Expands exclusion to most of Asia
See earlier slide for full details. This was the first federal immigration restriction, targeting Chinese women by presuming them to be prostitutes.
×
Chinese Exclusion Act (1882)
The first federal law to ban immigration based explicitly on race/nationality.
Banned: Chinese laborers from entering the U.S. for 10 years
Allowed: Only merchants, diplomats, students, and travelers (with strict documentation)
Barred: Chinese from naturalization (becoming citizens)
Extended: Renewed multiple times, made permanent in 1902, not repealed until 1943
Significance: This fundamentally changed American immigration policy from open to restrictive, from economic to racial. It established the principle that the U.S. could exclude people based on race.
×
Asiatic Barred Zone (1917)
Part of the Immigration Act of 1917, this law expanded exclusion from just Chinese to most of Asia.
The "Zone": Banned immigration from a geographic region including:
India and South Asia
Southeast Asia (Burma, Siam, Malay Peninsula)
Parts of the Middle East (Arabia, Afghanistan)
Pacific Islands
Japan and the Philippines were excluded from the zone (Japan due to diplomatic pressure, Philippines because it was a U.S. colony).
Impact: Effectively banned almost all Asian immigration except from Japan and the Philippines.
×
National Origins Act (1924)
Also called the Johnson-Reed Act, this created a comprehensive system of racial quotas.
Quota system: Limited immigration from each country to 2% of that nationality present in the 1890 census
Why 1890? To favor Northern/Western Europeans and restrict Southern/Eastern Europeans
Asian exclusion: Banned ALL Asians (including Japanese) by creating category of "aliens ineligible for citizenship"
No quotas for Americas: Latin American and Canadian immigration remained unrestricted (but still subject to bureaucratic barriers)
Effect: This remained the foundation of U.S. immigration law until 1965. It enshrined racial preferences: Northern Europeans favored, Southern/Eastern Europeans restricted, Asians banned, Africans nearly banned.
The Transformation of Immigration Policy
🔑 Critical Shift
Immigration policy moves from economic regulation to racial engineering.
These laws do not respond to Chinese migration—they redefine American identity.
Part V
"Yellow Peril": Race, Fear, and Popular Culture
How culture prepared the ground for exclusion
Law Does Not Operate Alone
Culture prepares the ground.
🔑 Key Concept
"Yellow Peril" was a system of discourse that portrayed Asians as:
Inscrutable
Unassimilable
Dangerous
Civilization-threatening
×
"Yellow Peril" Discourse
Definition: A body of ideas, images, and narratives that portrayed Asians (especially Chinese and later Japanese) as a racial threat to Western civilization.
Core Themes:
Inscrutability: "You can never know what they're thinking" — portrayed as mysterious, devious, unreadable
Unassimilability: "They will never become American" — culturally and racially incapable of adopting Western values
Danger: Economic threat (job competition), moral threat (vice and disease), military threat (invasion)
Mass: "The yellow horde" — overwhelming numbers that could swamp white civilization
Origins:
The term "Yellow Peril" (German: Gelbe Gefahr) gained prominence in the 1890s, popularized by Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany who feared rising Asian (especially Japanese) power. It reflected anxieties about:
Japan's military modernization (defeated China 1895, Russia 1905)
China's population size
Competition for empire and markets in Asia
Racial theories about "civilization" and "barbarism"
Sources of Yellow Peril Discourse
Fueled By:
Pseudoscience (racial biology)
Imperial anxiety (competition for Asia)
Global power shifts (Japan's rise)
Labor conflict (white workers' fears)
Examples:
Political cartoons
Kaiser Wilhelm's Gelbe Gefahr
Pulp fiction (Fu Manchu)
Newspapers, postcards
Visual Evidence: Political Cartoons
IMAGE PLACEHOLDER Dimensions: 1000x700px
Search terms:
"Yellow Peril political cartoon 1880s"
"Chinese exclusion anti-Chinese cartoon"
"The Coming Man John Bull Uncle Sam"
"George Frederick Keller Wasp magazine"
Suggested sources: Library of Congress, Bancroft Library, Harpweek
Analytical Insight
🔑 Critical Thinking
This is discourse, not description—a system of meaning that produces fear as "truth."
Yellow Peril wasn't a response to real threats. It was a cultural construction that made people BELIEVE Asians were threatening.
Part VI
Survival, Adaptation, and Enclave Formation
Despite exclusion, Asian communities endured
Resistance and Resilience
Despite exclusion, Asian communities endured through:
Concentrated communities where immigrants lived, worked, and built institutions.
Chinatowns emerged in San Francisco, New York, Los Angeles, and other cities as spaces where:
Chinese could find housing (often denied elsewhere)
Chinese businesses could operate
Cultural practices could be maintained
Mutual support networks functioned
Not by choice: Enclaves were often responses to segregation and exclusion, not voluntary isolation. Chinese wanted to live in Chinatowns because they were unwelcome elsewhere.
×
"Paper Sons"
A strategy Chinese immigrants used to circumvent exclusion laws.
How It Worked:
The 1906 San Francisco earthquake destroyed birth records. Chinese men in the U.S. (especially those with citizenship) could claim that children were born to them in China. They would sell these "slots" to young Chinese men who wanted to immigrate.
The young men would memorize detailed information about their "paper father's" village, family, and life story. When they arrived at Angel Island (the West Coast immigration station), they were interrogated extensively. If their stories matched their "father's," they were admitted as citizens' sons—even though they weren't actually related.
Significance:
Showed Chinese determination to reunite families despite exclusion
Demonstrated sophisticated resistance to unjust laws
Created complex "paper families" that lasted generations
Important Reframing
🔑 Analytical Point
Enclaves are not signs of isolation—they are responses to enforced exclusion.
When people couldn't live, work, or belong elsewhere, they built their own institutions and communities.
Closing Synthesis
What Asian Exclusion Reveals
The Limits of American Pluralism
Asian exclusion reveals:
Cities became diverse—but not equally inclusive
Law, labor, and culture worked together to racialize belonging
Urbanization intensified debates over:
Citizenship
Race
Nationhood
Bridge to Next Lecture
The next lecture turns inward—to the urban environment itself.
We'll examine how density, disease, and infrastructure forced cities to confront the biological consequences of mass migration.
From the politics of exclusion to the politics of sanitation and public health.
Key Takeaway
🔑 Remember This
Urban America was built through inclusion and exclusion.
Race determined not just who entered the city, but who could belong, reproduce, and claim the future.
Lecture Prep Reading List
(Instructor Reference)
Mae Ngai — Impossible Subjects How restriction created the "illegal alien" and fused race, law, and national identity
Erika Lee — The Chinese Exclusion Act How exclusion emerged from labor conflict, racial ideology, and local violence
Sucheng Chan — Asian American History Transnational migration and sojourner culture
Moon-Ho Jung — Coolies and Cane How "coolie labor" was racialized and stigmatized
John Kuo Wei Tchen — Yellow Peril! How fear was produced through popular culture and visual media