Conquest and Resistance

Native Nations, Allotment, and Survival

HIST 102 — United States History Since 1877
Chapter 18, Lecture 1

⌨️ Keyboard Shortcuts

What This Lecture Is NOT

  • A battle-by-battle history of the "Indian Wars"
  • A story of inevitable progress
  • Frontier romance or mythology

What it IS: An analysis of how conquest functioned in practice

Guiding Question

What does conquest look like when the goal is not merely territorial control, but the transformation—or elimination—of entire ways of life?

Key premise: Battles matter as moments that reveal larger strategies—but policy, environment, law, and culture ultimately proved more decisive.

Part I

Native Nations Before Conquest

Political, Social, and Economic Systems

Political Organization

  • Plains nations functioned as sovereign political communities
  • Authority rested in councils and recognized chiefs/headmen
  • Decision-making emphasized consensus over coercion
  • Effective for mobile societies—but vulnerable to centralized nation-states

Economic Systems

Plains economies organized around:

  • Buffalo hunting as the economic foundation
  • Seasonal migration following resources
  • Regional trade networks spanning thousands of miles
🔑 Key Difference

Wealth and status tied to kinship, mobility, and animals—NOT land ownership

Gender Roles and Power

Men's Roles

  • Hunting
  • Warfare
  • Diplomacy
  • Political/military authority

Women's Roles

  • Food processing
  • Shelter construction
  • Clothing production
  • Control of household resources

Women exercised substantial influence through kinship networks and marriage alliances

The Challenge for Conquest

🔑 Why This Matters

To dismantle these societies, the United States did not simply need military victory—it needed to undermine the ecological, economic, and social foundations of Native autonomy.

This explains why conquest took so many forms beyond battlefield combat.

Part II

Violence and Conquest

When Battles Matter—and When They Don't

Why Battles Aren't the Center

  • Hundreds of armed conflicts occurred across the West
  • Focusing on tactics obscures:
    • Structural power imbalances
    • Demographic pressure
    • Industrial capacity
    • Long-term policy outcomes

Native resistance failed not due to lack of courage—but due to asymmetries in logistics, population, and environmental control.

Two Battles That Matter Symbolically

1876 Little Bighorn — Rare Indigenous military victory; showed limits of U.S. control
1890 Wounded Knee — A massacre, not a battle; symbolic end of armed resistance
Key Takeaway

Battles punctuate the story, but policy finishes it.

Part III

Buffalo Destruction

Economic and Ecological Warfare

Buffalo Destruction

IMAGE PLACEHOLDER
400x350px

Search: "pile of buffalo skulls 1870s" or "buffalo bone pile railroad"

Sources: Library of Congress, National Archives

Destruction driven by:

  • Railroad expansion
  • Commercial hide markets
  • Deliberate military strategy

The acknowledged logic:

Destroy the buffalo → Force dependence → Eliminate autonomy

Three Forms of Warfare

Economic

Destroyed the foundation of Plains economies

Ecological

Transformed the Great Plains environment

Cultural

Eliminated sacred and ceremonial center of life

🔑 Analytical Point

Where military conquest proved costly or incomplete, environmental destruction succeeded.

Regional Variation: California

The Logic of Elimination

  • Gold Rush (1849) created immediate settler pressure
  • Minimal treaty-making or reservation planning
  • Native peoples viewed as obstacles, not populations to manage

Forms of Violence

  • Vigilante campaigns
  • State-funded killing
  • Federal inaction

Interpretation

Many historians describe this as genocide

📝 Check Your Understanding

Quick Question

Why did U.S. officials and commercial interests systematically destroy the buffalo herds?

  1. To clear land for railroad construction
  2. To force Native peoples into dependency on reservations
  3. To supply the commercial hide market
  4. All of the above

Part IV

The Reservation System

Containment and Dependency

The Reservation System

  • Reservations as tools of spatial and political control
  • Fixing mobile peoples in place enabled:
    • Surveillance
    • Ration-based coercion
    • Administrative oversight
  • Traditional authority eroded under federal agents
🔑 Key Point

Dependency was not an accident but a structural feature. Reservations were designed to manage Native peoples, not preserve Native cultures.

Allotment: The Dawes Act (1887)

What It Did

  • Broke up communal landholding
  • Assigned individual plots (160 acres)
  • Declared "surplus" land open to whites

Underlying Goals

  • Dismantle communal sovereignty
  • Impose private property norms
  • Restructure family/gender relations

Results: Native land holdings fell from 138 million acres in 1887 to 48 million acres by 1934

Boarding Schools

Conquest Across Generations

IMAGE PLACEHOLDER
450x300px

Search: "Carlisle Indian School before after" or "Native American boarding school children"

Sources: National Archives, Carlisle Indian School Digital Resource Center
  • Forced removal from families
  • Suppression of language and religion
  • Renaming, uniforms, discipline
  • Cultural erasure as explicit goal

"Kill the Indian, save the man"

— Capt. Richard Henry Pratt, founder of Carlisle

Resistance and Survival

Ghost Dance and Wounded Knee

  • The Ghost Dance: spiritual movement emphasizing renewal and hope
  • Not inherently violent—rooted in belief and meaning-making
  • U.S. officials interpreted religious practice as military threat
The Ghost Dance promised that faithful practice would restore the buffalo, bring back the ancestors, and renew the earth—a response to unimaginable loss.

Conclusion: Mechanisms of Conquest

Conquest operated through multiple mechanisms:

Military
Ecological
Administrative
Legal
Cultural
  • U.S. Indian policy was adaptive, not uniform
  • Native survival occurred under conditions of extreme coercion

Coming Next: The Mythic West

As conquest solidified, Americans faced a new problem—
how to remember what they had done,
and how to transform violence into national memory.

Lecture 2 examines how the "Wild West" became American mythology.